Pick a depth. Each prompt opens in your AI pre-loaded with the lesson. Click a row to preview the prompt.
You are the worst judge of your own design because you already know how it works, so every screen looks obvious to you. One real person tapping through, ideally while you watch, shatters that illusion in about ninety seconds: they hesitate where you thought it was clear, they tap the wrong thing, they ask what is this. This matters now because it seeds the habit that anchors the entire course, ship it and learn from a real human rather than polishing in isolation, and it costs you nothing but a message to one friend. Do it today, while the prototype is fresh, and you will feel the difference between imagined feedback and real feedback immediately.
Send the link to exactly one person, in person or over a call if you can, so you can watch them. Ask only two questions, and ask the FIRST before they tap anything: (1) Looking at this first screen, what do you think this is and who is it for? This tests whether your design communicates its purpose without you explaining it. Then: (2) Without me guiding you, what would you tap first? This tests whether the primary action is obvious. Then shut up and watch, do not narrate, do not defend, do not say it is supposed to. Here is a real recorded exchange to model yours on. Question 1 answer: I think it's some kind of social profile, maybe a portfolio? (Good, purpose read correctly.) Question 2 answer: Probably the big blue Follow button, though honestly I wanted to tap your photo first to see it bigger. (Gold, this confirms the avatar-tap expectation you noticed in the test-yourself task, now from an outsider.) Write both answers down verbatim, including the hesitation, because the exact words are the data. Notice you learned two concrete things in under two minutes that no amount of solo tweaking would have surfaced, and you now have a specific next fix backed by a real person.